FIELD GUIDE 01 / STEWARDSHIP
Who Promised What?
Turn an overdue donor update into a clear handoff.
“Follow up with Morgan” is hard to finish. “Check the attendance count with Ben by October 9, then update Morgan by October 11” gives someone work they can do.
This example is fictional.
A promise someone else can pick up
| Field | Completed example |
|---|---|
| Promise as communicated | “I’ll send you September’s attendance figures by October 11.” |
| Where it was made | Amina’s October 4 call note; internal relationship record EXAMPLE-104. |
| Person responsible for answering the donor | Amina. |
| Original deadline | October 11. |
| Missing piece | The program team has not verified the count of distinct students. |
| Next action | Ben checks the register for duplicate attendance entries by October 9. |
| Next check | Amina checks with Ben on October 9. |
| If the count is still unavailable | Amina tells Morgan what is outstanding by October 11 and gives a realistic next check date. |
| Evidence of completion | Final figures linked to the source record, final email and actual send date. |
Ben owns the count. Amina owns the answer to Morgan. Waiting for Ben does not remove Amina’s responsibility to keep Morgan informed.
The answer still needs an owner.
Link the checked register by October 9.
Check with Ben October 9. Keep the original deadline visible.
Count still missing? Amina explains the delay by October 11 and gives the next check date.
Send the internal handoff
If the deadline slips
Choose the next date after checking what is realistic. Keep October 11 in the record; add the update and any revised agreement alongside it.
Make your own record
Keep sensitive notes in the controlled relationship record. A shared work list can use an internal ID and a link.
Fill in one promise. Take the handoff and any missing decisions into your next team conversation.
Use an internal ID. Keep sensitive details in your controlled relationship record. Inputs stay on this page and disappear on reload.
7 decisions to finish
- Person preparing this handoff: Recover the exact promise and link the conversation where it was made.
- Person preparing this handoff: Agree who will answer the donor, including a substitute if needed.
- Person preparing this handoff: Find the original donor deadline; keep it even if the plan changes.
- Person preparing this handoff: Agree who will provide the missing fact or decision, what they will deliver, and by when.
- Person preparing this handoff: Set a time to check progress with the person doing the work.
- Person preparing this handoff: Decide who will tell the donor if the work is delayed and when they will write.
- Person preparing this handoff: Name the verified result and delivery record that will prove the promise is complete.
Use the gaps to decide what to do
| What is missing? | Next action |
|---|---|
| The actual promise | Return to the conversation record. Clarify with the relationship owner before assigning a guess. |
| Someone responsible | Agree who will answer the donor. Name a substitute if that person is away. |
| A reliable figure | Assign verification to the source owner. Keep a separate donor-update date. |
| Time to complete everything | Decide what to defer. Tell anyone affected by a changed commitment. |
| Proof it was completed | Check the final version and delivery record. “Draft written” is not “update sent.” |
Start the team review with promises due or overdue. End with decisions and named actions. An item stays open because something specific remains—not simply because its status says “waiting.”
To see this work beside a donor record, watch Gratona’s stewardship walkthrough. It follows giving history through a saved staff task and a relationship-plan draft.
Reading connection: Trevor and Tarren Bragdon’s 7-Figure Fundraising, on coordinating donor experience. This record and the fictional messages are original Gratona examples.
Explore the reading list ↗